
Sep 2, 2025
Welcome to The Pelican Brief
We’re excited to introduce The Pelican Brief, our new newsletter designed to keep you informed and connected on all things Louisiana politics. Produced by The Tatman Group, this publication will bring you timely, relevant, and insightful updates on legislative activity, regulatory developments, and political events shaping our state.
From in-depth coverage of key bills and elections to legal rulings, agency actions, and industry impacts, The Pelican Brief will be your trusted source for understanding the decisions that affect your organization, your community, and Louisiana’s future.
You’ll also find periodic highlights on positive news and policy successes—because Louisiana’s story is more than just politics; it’s about people, progress, and resilience. Whether you’re a client, partner, or simply invested in Louisiana’s future, our goal is to ensure you’re always “in the know.”
Louisiana’s 2026 Senate Race: A Primary Showdown in the Making
Louisiana is heading into one of its most closely watched U.S. Senate contests in years. With the election scheduled for November 3, 2026, the race features an embattled incumbent, a crowded Republican field, and a brand-new election system that could reshape the outcome.
For the first time since 2010, Louisiana voters will not be using the state’s famous “jungle primary” system. A law passed in 2024 reinstated closed partisan primaries, meaning voters may only cast ballots in their party’s primary. If no candidate secures a majority, the top two move to a runoff. This change is expected to harden party lines and make it more difficult for moderates to rely on crossover support.
Republican Senator Bill Cassidy, first elected in 2014, is seeking a third term. Cassidy enters the race with a major advantage: more than $9 million raised and nearly $8.7 million cash on hand. Yet he is also politically vulnerable. His vote to convict Donald Trump during Trump’s second impeachment trial continues to draw criticism from conservative activists, opening space for challengers who are eager to brand him as out of step with the GOP base.
Several Republicans have already declared:
John Fleming, Louisiana State Treasurer and former Congressman, launched his campaign in 2024 and is running as a strong conservative alternative.
Blake Miguez, a State Senator and Trump ally, announced in June 2025 with fiery rhetoric, accusing Cassidy of “betraying our state, our president, and our principles.”
Eric Skrmetta, a Public Service Commissioner, and Sammy Wyatt, a healthcare professional, have also entered the field.
Other lesser-known candidates have filed paperwork, while speculation continues about Congresswoman Julia Letlowpossibly entering the race with the backing of Governor Jeff Landry and Trump supporters. If Letlow ultimately decides not to run, it is possible that State Representative Julie Emerson, a rising conservative figure, may step in to challenge Cassidy.
So far, Cassidy maintains a commanding lead. An April 2025 poll by Ragnar Research showed him at 45 percent, compared with Fleming at 18 percent and other challengers in single digits. Still, a sizable number of voters remain undecided, suggesting room for movement as the campaign intensifies.
The stakes in Louisiana are high for both the state and the national GOP. The switch to closed primaries may favor hardline conservatives and complicate Cassidy’s re-election strategy. Trump’s influence looms large, with Cassidy’s impeachment vote likely to remain a focal point. And with the Senate narrowly divided, Republicans cannot afford costly internal battles in safe red states.
The 2026 Senate race in Louisiana will test whether Cassidy’s incumbency and fundraising muscle can withstand a wave of conservative challengers. It will also serve as an early indicator of how the GOP navigates internal divisions in a post-Trump era.
Supreme Court Sets Stage for High-Stakes Re-Argument on Louisiana Redistricting Case
The U.S. Supreme Court has pressed pause on one of the most closely watched redistricting battles in the country: Louisiana v. Callais. The case sits at the intersection of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) and the Equal Protection Clause, and its outcome could reshape how congressional maps are drawn—not just in Louisiana, but nationwide.
After the 2020 Census, Louisiana redrew its congressional map. Despite Black residents comprising about one-third of the state’s population, the legislature maintained just one majority-Black district. Civil rights groups sued, and in 2022 a federal court ruled that the map violated Section 2 of the VRA, which prohibits diluting minority voting power.
Lawmakers responded in January 2024 by passing a new plan (S.B. 8) that created a second majority-Black district.
That fix sparked a new challenge—this time from a group of non-Black voters who claim the legislature went too far. They argue S.B. 8 is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, saying race was the predominant factor in drawing the new district.
A federal three-judge panel agreed (2–1), ruling that the map violated the Equal Protection Clause. But with elections looming, the Supreme Court allowed the map to stand temporarily, avoiding voter confusion for the 2024 cycle.
In March 2025, the Justices heard oral arguments in the consolidated cases (Louisiana v. Callais and Robinson v. Callais). But instead of issuing a decision in June, the Court ordered re-argument this fall, an unusual step signaling deep divisions among the Justices.
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented, blasting the delay as judicial avoidance: “The Court has a duty to decide cases properly before it. Postponing this case only prolongs uncertainty.”
Why It Matters
Voting Rights vs. Equal Protection: The Court must decide whether a map designed to fix a Voting Rights Act violation can simultaneously violate the Constitution’s prohibition on race-based redistricting.
Representation: For now, Louisiana voters will head into the 2026 elections with two majority-Black districts—a major shift in representation.
National Impact: A ruling against Louisiana’s map could open the door to challenges of similar remedial maps in other states.
The Court will re-hear arguments on October 15, 2025. A ruling is expected by June 2026, just months before the next congressional elections.
Until then, the future of Louisiana’s congressional map—and perhaps the balance between minority voting protections and constitutional limits on race-conscious districting—hangs in the balance.
Louisiana v. Callais
